Consider the photos above, guys.

Each and every guy in the photos above has an average sized cock. Not small. Average. I’m posting this as an adjunct to a previous post about ‘beefcake’ type males, and this immediately got me thinking about the way males in Second Life portray themselves.

I’m not immediately drawn to their cocks, though. I’d say, first and foremost, I’d focus on their faces and physique. Each one is a good looking man! In the case of the scrumptious looking one with the hairy chest…mmmmmmmmm! What a hunk!

The size of their cocks is immaterial. Their cocks don’t define them.

So why is it that so many SL men have something between their legs that’s almost routinely over-sized and unrealistic?

 

Above is photographed a realistically sized Second Life cock (Aero’s type). Below are a series of photographs of Midnight Lotus cocks in various sizes.

Midnight Lotus ‘Humble’ sized cock

Midnight Lotus ‘Modest’ sized cock

Midnight Lotus ‘Standard’ sized cock

All three are realistic and lets face it guys, more of you are on the side of humble or modest than maybe even ‘standard’ sized. Of course this doesn’t prevent the majority of men opting for…

 

 

…the ‘Humungous’ size (and Midnight Lotus’s cocks go even bigger than this!). No fellas. You don’t look ‘impressive’. You look ridiculous. Another word of caution would be to spend some time colouring it correctly. If it’s your pride and joy, try to look as if you’ve spent some time on it, not just slapping on the first colour that comes out of the box and looks stupid. Early *cough* research would indicate that Second Life naturist males do try to get it right whereas males on a ‘nude beach’ (there appears to be a difference, mentioning no names *cough* Skinny Dip Inn *cough*) look dreadful. If I were to be indulging in, shall we say, certain physical activities with males in Second Life, I know I’d be drawn more to the naturist male rather than the badly assembled naked male at some locations.

 

Abigail